The subsequent great peripherals war has been waged over your ears. After every company on earth put out a gaming mouse then a mechanical keyboard, now it’s time for headsets. So gaming headsets.
We all know you don’t desire to scroll through every single headset review when all you want is a simple answer: “What’s the ideal gaming headset I could buy with my hard-earned dollars?” This web site supports the answer you seek, irrespective of what your budget is.
We’ll keep updating our recommendations as we have a look at new releases and look for stronger contenders. For this latest update, we’ve reviewed a few fancypants models, namely the Sennheiser Game Zero and and Sennheiser GSP 350, along with the Audio-Technica ATH-AG1X. For further earthly budgets, we’ve also tested the SteelSeries Arctis 7, the HyperX Cloud Revolver S, and the Logitech G533, which debuts as our new best mid-range wireless headset.
Kingston doesn’t have a similar pedigree within the headset space as the competitors, although the HyperX Cloud is a winning device in a cheap price.
Our 2016 headset recommendation remains basically the same as our 2015 headset recommendation (and our 2014, as an example): The Kingston HyperX Cloud. Or, if you’re feeling a bit fancier, the Cloud II. It’s comfortable, it appears great, and (additionally) it’s comparatively cheap. What else could you want in a headset?
True to its name, the HyperX Cloud is amongst the most comfortable headsets in the marketplace. It’s hefty, having a solid-metal construction that belies its cheap price, but sits feather-light in the head. The faux-leather earpieces are generously padded, oversized, and form a great seal without squeezing way too hard.
And yes it sounds excellent. As I said in your review, this isn’t a studio-quality pair of headphones. It’s got the standard gaming-centric bass boost and a slick top quality, but both are subtle enough that the HyperX Cloud competes favorably with laptop headphone twice its price. There’s no Kingston-provided methods to adjust the sound, considering the fact that the HyperX Cloud connects through standard 3.5mm jacks, nevertheless, you honestly shouldn’t must tweak it at all from the box. It appears pretty damn great.
The sole downside is the microphone. It’s very flexible, that i appreciate, but has an inclination to pick up background noise and plosives while leaving your voice nasally and hollow.
The slightly-more-expensive HyperX Cloud II is, I feel, more a lateral move than a noticable difference over its predecessor. It swaps the 3.5mm connection for a 7.1-ready USB soundcard with better in-line controls and some noise cancellation around the microphone, however you wouldn’t notice an enormous distinction between the two iterations and I’m uncertain the rise in cost makes it worth while.
Regardless, either model is a wonderful choice for a gaming headset. In an increasingly crowded market, the HyperX Cloud nails pretty much every major category with few significant compromises. I hope the following model improves on the microphone, however, for $80 it’s a steal.
The Cloud Stinger provides solid sound, serious comfort, and an attractive design for everyone who just requires a “good enough” headset without any wallet-shock.
HyperX’s Cloud headset continues to be our favorite, but the company undercut themselves just a little by releasing the HyperX Cloud Stinger. Listed at $50, it’s one of the cheapest gaming headsets I’ve experienced from your reputable brand. And it’s good.
Sure, it’s not quite as great as the initial Cloud, but for many people the Stinger ought to do all right. The plastic chassis lacks several of the original Cloud’s panache and durability, but looks high-end from the distance and sits pretty slim about the head. HyperX also solved the Cloud’s biggest issue and lastly put a volume slider straight on the bottom in the right earcup and gave it a flip-to-mute microphone, so forget about fiddling with in-line controls.
With regards to audio, the Cloud Stinger’s got an excellent mid-range with hardly any distortion even at high volumes. The treble is a bit underpowered and also the bass range is nearly nonexistent, but 80 percent for any given game, film, or song may come through clear and clean.
If you already have a significant headset, especially the original Cloud, I wouldn’t say the Stinger is important-own. However, if you’re looking for an excellent value on entry-level hardware, this can be it. It’s an insane bargain when you compare it with other headsets from the same price tier.
Only under $100, Corsair’s Void Wireless is mostly an excellent wireless headset, but you will come across some compromises.
Frankly speaking, Corsair doesn’t have any competition within this category. Most decent wireless gaming headsets will run you $150 or even more. Corsair’s Void Wireless is priced with a mere $100, which leaves it on its lonesome.
But even accounting for that vacuum, it’s pretty good. Not phenomenal, mind you, but at the price you’re receiving a bargain.
I wasn’t really sure what you should make in the Void’s weird, diamond-shaped ear cups but after some use I’m actually pretty pleased. The Void Wireless sits a little forward on the head, with the band resting just above your forehead. It takes some getting used to, but the outcome is less tension on the jaw and much more on the rear of your head where it’s less noticeable. I wouldn’t say it’s as comfortable since the classical HyperX Cloud, but undoubtedly I really like it a lot more than its predecessor, the H2100.
The on-headset controls are fairly intuitive, having a volume rocker at the base in the left ear, plus oversized buttons for power and mute on the side. And it’s got 16.8 million color RGB lighting, if that’s your bag.
The most significant design issue is the Void Wireless is heavy. It’s not an issue when sitting up, but if you gaze down or check out the headset has a tendency to slide around. I don’t know whether it’s as a result of battery or perhaps the metal-augmented construction, yet your neck gets a workout with this particular headset.
Sound-wise, the Void Wireless still needs some work. It may sound passable, especially while gaming, but throwing on some music sets the Void Wireless’s limitations into stark relief. The low-end is muddy and distorted, along with the whole variety of mid-to-high-end frequencies sounds slick, like you’ve applied excessive compression.
You can adjust the headset’s sound in Corsair’s software, but Corsair’s application is still somewhat unwieldy. Better than a year ago, I believe, but nevertheless not on par with Razer, SteelSeries, or Logitech. Also, some users have reported issues with firmware updates-not just a great sign.
“This doesn’t sound like a very positive review,” you could say. And you’re right, it’s not. The Void Wireless is just not a terrific headset, as mentioned up top. But it is the very best wireless gaming headset under $150, and given the amount of wires are attached to my PC at virtually any moment, the convenience of cheap wireless may be worth sacrificing a bit of audio quality.
Logitech’s G533 doesn’t have quite the identical breadth of options because the G933, but a far more restrained design along with a bargain price get this a solid contender for best wireless headset.
It’s a tough call replacing our former mid-tier wireless pick, the Logitech G933, featuring its sibling-successor the Logitech G533. Like, really tough. The G933 is a superb headset, with crisp and well-balanced audio and some nifty design features (like having the capacity to keep the USB dongle inside an earcup).
But I’m still replacing it. Why? Well, aesthetics certainly are a huge reason. If you need an indication how Logitech’s design language has shifted in past times year or more, your search is over gam1ngheadset the G933 and G533. The G933 was all sharp angles and sci-fi. The G533 on the flip side is sleek, professional, restrained. By using a piano-black finish and soft curves, it seems like a headset produced by Audio-Technica or Sennheiser or a more mainstream audio company-not necessarily a “gaming” headset. I enjoy it.
The G533’s design can also be functional. The microphone isn’t as hidden as I’d like, but that’s the sole flaw. The headset is lightweight, durable, and fewer vise-grip tight than its predecessor.
As for audio fidelity? It’s not quite similar to the G933, however the differences are minimal. The G533 lacks a little bit of oomph, especially at lower volumes, along with its 7.1 support is subpar. Those are hardly reasons to step away, though-many people will run the headset loud enough to counteract the headset’s insufficient presence, and virtual 7.1 is (in my view) pretty much always bad. The G533 is worse in comparison to the average, however the average remains to be something I select to prevent day-to-day.
Whatever the case, the G933 is still being offered and is an absolutely sensible choice for some, especially if you want console support. The G533 is PC-only, even though the G933 can be attached by 3.5mm cable with other devices. And if you value comfort over audio fidelity, have a look at the SteelSeries Arctis 7 too-another excellent choice.
Astro’s new A50 touts a new charging station and much better controls, but nonetheless doesn’t put the audio you might expect coming from a $300 set of headphones.
SteelSeries Siberia 800 Wireless Dolby 7.1 Gaming Headset
Following a new generation of your game earphone and Siberia 800 released in 2016, I thought we may finally break the tie that’s dominated our splurge headset pick in the past couple of years.
But once again, there’s no clear winner at this $300 price-though Astro certainly made some strides toward edging out SteelSeries.
The newest A50’s biggest improvement is definitely the battery. The new model overcomes an extensive-running weak spot and packs in 12 to 15 hours of life-enough to help you get through a long day of gaming. Much better, it features gyroscopes from the ears that allow it to detect whether you’ve set it down. It automatically shuts off ten seconds later then, then turns back and connects for your PC on once you pick it back up. Its base station also serves as a charger, a nice combination of function and beauty.